there is a duty

Posted on by 0 comment

There is duty, shared between what is family, what is society, and what is self. Each of these responsibilities are earned, through the definitions of what we are willing to pay, to sustain a relationship that continues to build a future we can not only survive, but enjoy as happiness lived.

To that end, are all the possibilities/ problems/ needs/ and rights fought for or lost.  Realities created between the lives which intersect in each human journey through time itself.

I will examine for the purposes of this writing, which is to teach:  a moment in my own time, as is current and useful. Your ability to use the information is irrelevant; “I teach to teach/ you choose for yourself what has value”.

 

As explained by the letters which will follow, my mother is in the nursing home. I have two sisters, each of which believe “I have invaded their lives/ and seek to ruin their future”.  Because I have said to the nursing home and through them the state of IL:  that I do have a legitimate right to aid and abet (without criminal connotations: “to assist without regard to irrelevant rules”) my own mother in her wheelchair/ by simply building a slight modification (which interfered with nor endangered anyone) for her to use.  That was instantly discarded by the state “we have rules here”. Or more distinctly:  you have no right to aid or do anything for your mother/ but pay money, and ask us for sympathy.  I find that to be a complete disregard for the guaranteed freedoms of this democracy/ a  complete disregard and disrespect for me. That is not to say my mother cannot choose for herself/ she can, not an issue. This is simply about:  if I wish to show my own mother, that I value her enough to build something/ to help her life be a tiny bit better as described in the letters. Then that is my right:  so long as it harms none. A controversy intended to be defined by legal contest with the state of IL:  as they are in control of these types of issues. Beyond that, it is also necessary to inform the nursing home:  when the state is “fixed”/ you need to adjust as well. A fact of life, no need to wait. The wheelchair is everyday.

My sense of duty to self is:  I have a right, to aid my mother in simple ways, which none have the right to question legitimately/ it is that simple. Not even a question, “I have a right”.

My sense of duty to family is:  my mother owns the right, to let me help her/ and it is non-negotiable. No date of death can be distinguished, therefore it matters until that day comes. In contrast to that are my sisters. One fears, because “LIFE CAN BE UNFAIR (she has cause)”/ don’t steal my future.  One riots, because “YOU MUST OBEY THEIR RULES/ DON’T you understand, BULLIES are mean; they can make our lives miserable”. We can’t defeat them: SO HIDE (don’t let them come here)/ DO WHAT THEY WANT!  Or I will hate you forever. These are extreme behaviors considering they are not even  “involved”. This is a question between me, the freedom to aid my mother as I see fit: without endangering anyone.  And the state of IL making rules which go too far; along with the nursing home involved at the end of that controversy. But it does  not essentially involve them, or their inheritance.

These are descriptions of a society, that fails life.  Not a surprise, sense life itself has rarely or never even been considered particularly in the last fifty years of America. The righteous disagree, but its true.

My sense of duty to society is:  when confronted with rules or other failures that arise through leaders, but are more often the result of people “who bite on their heels”/ that want rules. The rules cause others grief, so they attack the leaders from the other side, demanding more rules. The leaders then “pull out their hair”/ and make more rules, to control the people who want rules to control those others. Then people who are the burden of society itself, enter in and bribe or betray the rest of the people so they can create rules to control the rules, and thereby take whatever they want.  The end result is:  EVERYONE is surrounded by an army of rules, which no one truly benefits from except the traitor. The problem being:  FEW can actually contest the rules, because there are more rules/ and as rules constrict their lives. There is an army of the righteous trying to always make more rules “so those DAMN PEOPLE, can’t do anything we don’t like”. Which builds resentment/ causes crime: and ends with “I HAVE A GUN”! and the lawyer is a legalized criminal, who WILL steal all your money/ in a courtroom, that will discard constitutional authority and its freedoms “with a tiny irrelevant rule/ if that”. While all the people hide, and run away in fear.  This is America;  land of the coward (scared to lose what you stole, to avoid reality, even when the world and the nation is going to die: because you would not face your truth.)/ or more correctly, this land is overrun by those who built an entire dictionary of irrelevant words:  just so they could control the communication/ and discard the people themselves. When the leaders are cowards, the people follow.  No you cannot say anything, “you don’t know the language”/ even if you do, they have more words you don’t know in reserve. To steal democracy itself.

DUTY SAYS:  our responsibility to life and society is, freedom must be given the right, to be free!  That sounds redundant, but it is true.  Merely saying “we the people are free”/ is nothing;  if “a billion rules” can take that freedom away.  That of course is exactly why rules exist:  TO TAKE THEIR DAMN FREEDOM AWAY/ we don’t like it! So the question for democracy is:  with liberty (the right to make our own laws)/ there must also be, the right to limit and refuse the righteous who are always trying to make rules. So they can be RULERS, and take our freedom away.

Sense there is no reliance on lawyers to do such a thing:  they will steal your heart, your money, and try to take your soul.  While demanding we have a right:  WE HAVE A DIPLOMA/ and that guarantees you owe me.  For my easy life, and what the vast majority call college: “best years of my life”.  Whereas the courtroom is run by lawyers, who demand:  there can be no others here/ and have made rules to insure that, and quash the insolent who refuse their crimes.  That too is a blanket statement:  not condemning all. Rather stating:  THERE ARE PROBLEMS HERE, A REBELLION against this democracy, by those in power. A corrupt court:  your rights are NOT free; but prison is, if we don’t like you. But then I revealed them as “traitors, or more”; and would expect nothing less: arises here! A conspiracy by all to hide in lies, cheating, and theft against their children:  “we lied/ pay later is not going to happen”.

Duty then demands the responsibility for fighting for this democracy itself:  falls upon whosoever can. It is that simple/ you cannot ask a man off the street;  to do “brain surgery”; without an education of merit. It will go badly for all involved.  Consequently the true fight within a courtroom belongs to the lawyer and its judge; in conjunction with society itself. But all refuse, the lawyer wants the money/ the judge wants the power/ and society just wants to be left alone, “don’t hurt me”.  Oddly enough, believe it or not;  that seems to leave me, simply trying to teach the insolent and sacred “we must fight for what we own”!  The tragedy is, people on both sides believe “they are RIGHT”; and can’t be questioned, because THEY OWN the rules. Which makes any “rule breaker/ or rule questioner” an enemy. Which makes society say:  ITS BAD ENOUGH/ DON’T make this worse.  Yet history will prove, if you don’t fight for what is right and valuable:  the thieves, traitors, and cheats; will only get worse.  Reality proves you would rather believe:  “with my gun/ I will take back all I lost”/ NEVER ONCE understanding, there will be consequences. Even worse, than for Syria. But alas:  the mob always believes “we are so many” they CAN’T take revenge. Well, just one in one million is 8,000 people: wanting violence/ just like you!  Once the fuel is lit, for America;  the consequence FOR THIS ENTIRE PEOPLE IS:    YOU STOLE MY LIFE (medical bills are just one), YOU CRUSHED MY HOPES (there is nothing left, but to beg), YOU CALLED ME WORTHLESS (not one of the nobility; don’t have a diploma/ or if you do, then a slave for all who weren’t chosen). A reality that exists FOR NOTHING; BUT A DAMN DIPLOMA, took over our world;  and more EXTORTION than society can stand. That reality, Will make stopping impossible. Cannibalism will occur. Nonetheless, if you have no brain/ then you must be another “priest of evolution”.

Without question, as in the past regarding this work:  the police and leadership in every form: will just assume I am a terrorist plotting violence with such words. “its him/ he is the problem”:  Never once accepting or admitting to the reality:  these are the choices of your own society, your leaders;  and the consequences they formed by their failure to take the future of life itself, seriously. No the children can’t save you anymore; you killed them with want, pride, arrogance (didn’t care), and power! I tell you plain, I am not going to attack you; nor will I be glad when others do:  failure is failure/ not a game to be won or lost. this is life or death/ like so MANY THREATS are for our entire world.  Even so, “you want to continue  playing god”:  satan!  As that is the descriptive word for destroyers of Creation itself.

 

So lets review:   apart from this world will soon die. What clearer proof can there be:  than people trying to ignite sun fire here on earth?  Go ahead take another look:  oh wait, just looking at the sun can make you blind. And its 91 million miles away today! A bigger failure in policing, and the courtroom:  does not exist.  Yet you pretend:  “the universities cannot be wrong”!  Congratulations,  “you win”.

       Nonetheless: in this tiny matter of freedom and rights.

  1. History proves, when confronted with rules and their rulers: nothing gets better without a fight. The fight for laws which protect us as society itself:  removes the rulers/ and aids justice.
  2. History proves, when society refuses to fight within the law; because they are certain they cannot win. Gathering weapons: Then civil war is coming. I have a gun, doesn’t need “fancy words”/ the words die, along with the people themselves and all they worked for.
  3. Democracy is: NOBODY gets to be the ruler! To enforce that, we made the constitution (our own written agreement “in our words”) as our government.  Demanding every employee shall swear:  the constitution is the government, and it decides/ NOT THEM. That, is the foundation of democracy; and it is not shared with an employee, to rule/ it is ours! We own the nation, state, etc.
  4. That brings us to WE THE PEOPLE: a reality of society purposely uneducated and truly uninformed about how, when, why, where, what and any other value:  with regard to keeping their democracy alive for themselves. A kindergarten class has more comprehension! It nonetheless begins with:   A vote to vote for someone else/ is not true democracy. Therefore the answer to that is:  vote on the law itself/ NOT on a politician.
  5. The courtroom and all of government: belong only to us as a people/ that is democracy in action.  The courtroom and everyone who works for “government”: IS AN EMPLOYEE/ not a ruler.  In fact those who swore they would uphold the constitution as “government first”/ are punishable, when they fail; regardless of position.  They are merely individuals like the rest of us:  except to get their job, THEY SWORE, not to offend the constitution or its legitimate interpretation; as accepted by the people themselves. We are the owners/ not the court. They are individuals, with a deliberate, defined job to do.
  6. THE LEGAL REMEDY for employees suspected of failing their duty is: first amendment redress of grievances/ a constitutional law, that gives the people themselves a LEGAL RIGHT to enforce the public investigation of employees charged with FAILING THEIR OATH OF OFFICE. Avoiding or destroying or rebelling against democracy, by refusing the authority of constitutional law. No small matter!
  7. So the question here is: WHAT does constitutional law, and democracy, and justice and life itself; have to do with the fact, this controversy is about the simple refusal of one man being able to help his own mother in a nursing home/ as he sees fit?

 

“let us review”:

The fundamental is:  I have lost my legally guaranteed freedom!

The functioning reality is:  “government employees, have invaded the relationship between my mother and me”.

The critical development is:  once those who believe themselves to be RULERS, have invaded the relationship between mother and son:  what legitimately is left? How is that NOT, “you went too far”.

The definition of duty is:  if you see or know, that a critical relationship between society and its framework law, HAS BEEN VIOLATED.  Then it is your responsibility to inform the others, and at least try to resolve this invasion of rights:  at far less than a murderous mob would do.  Because if the potential is bad enough, the day will come;  when a mob will form. Mobs need only the tiniest source of ignition, to ignite a war, or a tragedy. Therefore when a candle is lit/ duty reminds each one:  to snuff that out, before a forest fire will rage.  If you doubt/ people are proving regularly today:  they can indeed start a forest fire, “with just one match”.

 

Let us conclude:

My duty to self is:  to protect my future/ by protecting my world, my family, and my society for happiness.  I did the best I could:  just one man. Simple as that.

My duty to family according to my sisters is:  to aid and abet (obey the damn rules) my mother; by doing nothing.   As she is now worried about any and everything she can think of/ blaming me for all of that: damage has been done.  My duty to siblings is:  not to interfere in their lives, which in their version is to aid and abet (obey the damn rules)/ and let them live in peace. DON’T change our security beliefs,  about what the future will hold. They are truly stressed;  even though there is no cause. Their insistence in bringing our mom into this/ their own lives into this: is clear evidence of damage done. THEY BELIEVE, they are threatened/ so they live accordingly. Over something so small, that it is only the insistence:  I can provide a little something to improve my own mother’s life/ “I still value you”! This entire matter builds on nothing more than that!  Whether that is again initiated by “nursing home administration or not” is no longer important. The thread that binds us, is technically broken. That allows “this is why, I will legally leave this issue of rights;  alone personally”. Family is not a game (to win or to lose); even though some treat it so. Nonetheless, I have fought for this world and its life:  “for my entire lifetime”/ on the frontlines alone. It is YOUR turn to fight. Not as your constant fantasy of delusions; but in reality. Want is not enough/ neither are riots in the street! Use law.  I am done!  And that includes trying to salvage something for your children to use in their lives/ or the children I know:  simply done. You are dead:  just like the bible predicted “they will be marrying and giving their children in marriage” which means.  They don’t know anything is wrong/ but believe the future will be great.  Wrong.

My duty to society is:  to inform of we the people of  realities that threaten our future. To acknowledge the law decides/ but that law is formed entirely by the commands of government which is THE CONSTITUTION. Not the employee:  Federal controls/ state assists.

My duty to the nation itself/ as in democracy, is:  to advise of the opportunities in law for change. To acknowledge the potential in organization, which gives us all the right and the power to control those who would be our rulers.

My responsibility to human family is:  that we all deserve, to be free in our relationships particularly between parent and child:  so long as no harm is done. Life and family, is not a game/ we deserve that. Which means DON’T interfere/ help.

My responsibility to this world is:  to report the dissolution of everything that holds our future together, / and threatens all life on earth with extinction. You lies will fail.  I have so done:  in this my little version of “the free press”.

 

YOUR RESPONSIBILITY begins with:  the destruction of our world is the end of life.

YOUR RESPONSIBILITY begins with:  when we CANNOT let “these others” BE WRONG/ because the consequences are horrendous. Then they must be legally and purposely STOPPED. No excuses allowed:  you shall not, anymore/ or you will die.

YOUR RESPONSIBILITY begins with:  without resources, there is no future for a single child.  Or anything other than war. Not a game.

YOUR RESPONSIBILITY ends with:  “you either did/ or you did not do,  whatever you can legally do!  FOR,   LIFE COMES FIRST!  A reality which has no second chances; in a world so completely insane, people are even trying to ignite atoms on fire;   “just like on the sun”.  Wrong is, our planet becomes another sun!

 

The letters

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

FROM:  JAMES FRANK OSTERBUR

2191 county road, 2500 east   St. Joseph, IL 61873

DATED:  2/22/17

 

RE:  the private property of ___________nursing home.

In consideration of the following:

  1. Having identified a serious problem in the care of_________; which is her inability to properly nap in her own wheelchair. The reality established as:  a complete dis-alignment of her spine;  as is illustrated by the words, “bent over the side of the wheelchair in the shape of an upside down “letter J”.
    1. ESTABLISHED: this is a cruel and unusual punishment/ without justification. That can be remedied with a simple mechanical assembly.
    2. The function and purpose of the item provided by her son, in support of _______/ thereby cures this problem by providing a suitable head rest.
    3. Instead of accepting reality: The nursing home or the state employee establishes, SHE MUST BE PUNISHED/ by its refusal. An inappropriate and legally indefensible stance.
  2. Having identified a serious problem in the care of______ which is her inability to gain access to water when needed/ because of near immobile realities of body. The item provided by her son to alleviate this matter, by producing a permanent cup-holder for her usage/ built into the new side rail of her chair.  Clearly and substantially fixes that issue/ while providing ________with a place to put her drink when that is required..
    1. Established as cruel and unusual punishment: is the fact, without mobility, and without a proper place for her to put that drink when not completely finished. She is required to hold the water filled cup until it spills into her lap, making her clothes wet/ or spilling onto the floor.
    2. That is a repeated reality akin to torture on its smallest scale. It is an unnecessary indignity that is unworthy of her value.
    3. Instead of accepting the value in change: The nursing home or the state employee establishes, SHE MUST BE PUNISHED/ by its refusal. An inappropriate and legally indefensible stance.
  3. Having identified a serious problem in the care of_______; which is the inability to be close enough to the food table/ so as not to spill food all over herself.  Because the distance is twice that (we lean into the table to eat) of a person not in a wheelchair.  The end result of their failure to address the problem/ is modified by the second item provided to ________by her son;  which is a suitable tray that rests into a pivot point on the new wheelchair side rail. So as to halve the distance between the food table and herself. The consequence of that is far less spillage/ thereby added personal dignity.  Which means FAR LESS personal strife; at her own bodily failure to handle the food better. A reality that would inflict us all to some degree, if we put ourselves twice as far from the food than we do.  Those who are not nearly immobile have that option.
    1. Established as cruel and unusual punishment: because no one should have to be required to produce a mess/ because someone else is interfering in their lives. Tyrant is: I made a rule, and that makes me god/ YOU have no say. IN CONTRAST;  IS THE TRUTH;  that government is not given to any employee. Rather government in democracy is the constitution itself/ which grants certain limited powers, in the performance of their duty as AN EMPLOYEE: of we the people. A person whose job it is (employee), and nothing more;   to achieve the goals of that same constitution, for each and every citizen as best they can.
    2. Instead of choosing dignity for ________and functioning to achieve that goal. The nursing home or the state employee controlling them, establishes: SHE MUST BE PUNISHED/ by its refusal. An inappropriate and legally indefensible stance.
  4. Having identified a serious problem in the care of__________; when faced with drinking or eating:  the factory side rails of her wheelchair enclose her elbows. Which means when she raises a glass to drink/ or a spoon to eat:  HER ARMS RAISE THE FOOD too high for her mouth. Because her head has lowered far beyond what is normal. The consequence of that is:   she frequently gets a straw in her eye at times. She has to fight for a drink because it won’t line up with her mouth. She has an inordinate amount of trouble with her food, because she cannot move her elbows outward. The reality;  these side rails are too tall/ and her ability to adjust herself has suffered accordingly.
    1. Established as cruel and unusual punishment: by improper tooling. Which produces  or fails to address:  not being able to eat or drink properly;  significantly caused, because of a factory chair. Brings us to the extreme failure of those who declare themselves to be god as in “we know everything”!  Or more simply, the university diploma, which has taken over all government entirely;  is god. The insurgency was successful/ the resultant theft and bankruptcy against this state and all its citizens: an act of war!

Fundamentally or functionally, whether state controls or business denies; the university degree is a pandemic (the tragedy affects everyone) of disease (the individual life is irrelevant) instead of fighting for life.  They are, Interfering where you do not belong/ destroying what you do not own/ lying, about money/ terrorizing life by supporting those  with experiments so extreme even the solar system itself is in danger: etc.

Which does include such little things as, the extreme failure, presented by the state employees:  which is to erect “a blinding fence” in front of her window to the world. This act:  is a disease of arrogance so certain, your individual life does not matter.  Substantively establishing “welcome to your grave, your view to our world is dead; there is nothing left, unless we “your gods” allow it.

Another reality that must be removed, because state employees are not god;  because life is more important than your pride. As an employee of the people;  you may ask of the residents affected and their families:  what do you want. But unless it is clearly absolutely necessary to enforce a reality that takes away from life:  You shall not do so;  such is the claim called justice/ the reality of democracy/ and the purpose declared by we the people;  called freedom.

  1. Instead of care: The nursing home being controlled by the state employee establishes: SHE MUST BE PUNISHED/ by its refusal. An inappropriate and legally indefensible stance.

In consideration of these facts;  is the alternate side. Which means you, WHOSOEVER wishes to control the private property of __________Osterbur/ and confine her to realities which inflict damage upon her life.  ARE NOW REQUIRED to present a written statement declaring why the aforementioned devices presented by James Frank Osterbur/ son of the resident in _______ Nursing home, which is under the direction of both state and corporate influences:  should be discarded.

Establish your claim for REFUSAL OF the reasonable support, and functional developments assigned by reality:  which DO provide _________with some relief from her condition. 

SHE is under no demand to use the aforesaid devices/ should she so choose. BUT THIS CHAIR, IS HER PRIVATE PROPERTY, AND SHE DOES HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO IMPROVE, SUSTAIN, OR CHANGE HER PROPERTY AS SHE OR HER FAMILY SEE FIT.

Thereby support your legal position,  declare your complaint, and be prepared to legally defend it:  OR GET OUT OF THE WAY. By producing a written document reversing your position and allowing for the necessary changes as __________may decide for herself.

Should the state wish to be combative:  BE CERTAIN, to establish who and where shall the subpoena for court be sent.

But make no mistake:  TRIAL shall be constructed around the rights, rules, and realities of constitutional obedience required of you/ and the freedoms, justice, and foundation of democracy itself, that is expected by us all. You will bear in mind as well:  that in this trial, whereas _________pays for her residency therein.  YOU ARE HER EMPLOYEES; hired and PAID;  for the specific purpose of doing the best you can for her life and situation. Along with that reality are a string of legal parameters we will discuss.

BE ABSOLUTELY CERTAIN:  that should any form of trouble erupt, with regard to the residency of ________in the nursing home of her choice:  be established against her.  There will be legal consequences, and a penalty as the law allows in jury trial.

While I, her son, James Frank Osterbur do not legally hold power of attorney at this time.  I do choose to ACT ALONE, in this matter! I can and will address any issue presented in the certainty:  I DO HAVE A LEGAL RIGHT to support, provide, and defend my own mother.  Without any other legal claim to deny that fact.  This issue of fundamental support:  is about my work, my decision, my choice to legally argue I HAVE A RIGHT, to provide relief, to my own mother:  that will not be denied.

The only reason I am not legal guardian from the beginning is:  I told her, only the pills necessary would I allow to be given/ and no more.  She thought it would be better, if she had all the pills a doctor could prescribe.  As incidents have proved:  she was wrong.

 

Any assumption, that I am not willing to take this to  court, against the controlling entity:  will be proven wrong.

 

 

TO:  STATE OF ILLINOIS/ nursing home, and its affiliate corporate partner

FROM:  JAMES FRANK OSTERBUR  2191 county road 2500E  St. Joseph, IL 61873

(I require only written correspondence, so as to prove what is or is not said in this matter:  now described as, “without a right”.)

Dated: 2/27/17

 

RE:  reality due to the consequent fears of my siblings, in the legal matter:  “I have a right, to participate in my own mothers care/ and find solutions for her assistance, where I can”.

Since they do not understand: this very simple legal foundation.  FREEDOM constructs a plateau, wherein all things within that “dimensional authority of individual rights”;  are without the opportunity to judge,  by any authority. That is the assignment of democracy, and its consequent guarantee:  “we the people shall be freed, from those who try to rule over us”. That is our unity of government, and our truth:  before those with a university degree claimed NONE shall decide but us. And again:  “they have a book/ which cannot be declared wrong;  because some professor wrote it”. Thereby declaring themselves to be “god (can’t be wrong/ can’t be questioned/ none shall deny this  authority)”. A reality of complete rebellion against the United States of America/ the state of IL/ and all this people.  Because, “we are said to be free/ and that removes the ruler, and his or her book”. Religious zeal (we have a book/ that is god);  is forbidden in this democracy.  As a consequence, the insurgency of a university diploma, in its attempts to control and manipulate all forms of behavior and opportunities in this state or nation:  is betrayal of democracy itself/ and must be removed. “religion is a book”/ if your book is god:  then you are religious.

I am an unbeliever in “the university knows everything”/ and refuse its rule over me! I am a person who demands:  the constitution shall rule over us all.  Making this fraudulent claim of power and authority by a state or a corporate entity:  who denies to me, the freedom to assist my own mother as I see fit/ while endangering no one.  As a need to discuss the changes you must make.

WE ARE at this time, simply disputing the legality of refusing my assistance in providing solutions to the problems identified: which my mother experiences. That is believed to be a state of IL disposition of authority/ however if that includes the nursing home or its corporate entity; so be it.

WE ARE NOT disputing anything with regard to my mother, or her legal rights and possessions:  other than, WHETHER I AM ALLOWED TO SUBMIT SOLUTIONS FOR HER BENEFIT AND DECISIONS. That is her only participation in this matter/ and there is no other tangible legal consideration other than the fact, “like a car accident”.  The consequence of what is called Parkinson’s:   needs intervention and support.  In matters NOT resolved by the nursing home or state;  I have within my legal freedom of choice, provided solutions.

In contrast to that work and definition of details,  a clear purpose to leave these issues detailed in the initial submission:  leave this alone. Has been made, either by the state, or as expected because of the state/ by staff at the nursing home.

We are discussing NO GREAT THING, with regard to the item built by James Frank Osterbur/ as has been made clear.  It addresses small realities of life;  which are critical to the welfare and comfort of my own mother/ and in no way jeopardizes or contributes to “chaos” for the nursing home, its residents, or its staff.  The items built simply represent solutions, that have the potential to improve life for my mother.

THAT MEANS:   as is the constant of fools and fraud in government authority today, or its impact on business etc.  FAILURE is an ever present traitor due to a university degree.  You have no legal right/ and again, should there be a valued, true, and realistic cause for not using the devices made:  I will argue that, and if we can agree fix that accordingly. NO SIMPLE EXCUSES will be allowed. You will provide alternatives, that functionally take care of the problem:  or, what I have prepared will remain.  THAT INCLUDES the current attempt, to pretend there is any other cause; for replacing her wheelchair, with one the nursing home owns/ than to control that portion of this complaint.  It is a step in the wrong legal direction for you, and I suggest it won’t work.

 

This brings us to the functional separation of what can or cannot be in this;  soon to be legal  disagreement of authority. IF NECESSARY!

I merely demand the freedom to assist my mother, within the nursing home:  as I deem necessary, without interruption or interference. Or any cause to believe is worth trying to change.   THAT IS all I am asking/ and won’t take no for an answer. You are free to “fix, each of the four complaints identified”:  WITH SOMETHING APPROPRIATE, and better than what I provide. If you cannot/ then what I provide shall be freed, to try.  THIS IS NOT a desirable legal lawsuit/ as my mother is fading away, and the reality of a legal dispute may or may not be resolved;  before she has died.  Consequently it is far more important to me;  that her life should be improved NOW, not after your insipid illegal (democracy rules/ NOT a university book, or any other form of rebellion against what our constitution guarantees) playtime is over.

 

That brings us to my siblings; as they have convinced themselves to fear: an illegal and corrupt courtroom, with lawyers that instill fear due to extreme extortion/ and no rights to defend oneself against them. A conspiracy to destroy democracy in and of itself;  by refusing justice/ discarding fair play/ and demanding only the rich can try to buy a verdict;  “when the doors are closed”.  It is a concern, because democracy lays beaten and disabled by a rebellious army of “university is king”. No one else shall own a single right or possession. As is again in evidence by the nursing home trying to steal the wheelchair out from under her. That is a conspiracy of fraud; as it is a deliberate attempt to destroy evidence/ and replace it with their own lie. That decision does absolutely nothing, to fix or resolve the four issues I have detailed.

NONETHELESS, so long as more damage, or no irreparable damage exists:  the potential lawsuit that this describes is ONLY ABOUT the right/ and the legal freedom, to assist my mother as I see fit;  in her situation within the nursing home of her choosing.  Her current situation is:  the last two times I visited, she has been horizontal, and barely functioning/ thirsty. Prior to that she has been not better than 45 degrees from vertical for months; with her head down.  In contrast, I had brought her home two weeks before, to test the items I provide;  wherein she was vertical, because her shoulder and head, rested on the pillow I had made, keeping her aright. All risks to her person with regard to this item or any other I provide will be accepted by me. All risk associated with the item(s) I provide, with regard to any other person:  shall be deemed at the same equal liability of the nursing home. Thereby I will pay the increase in insurance cost;  attributed to the item’s I provide; ending that dispute.

IF DAMAGE CONTINUES TO MOUNT, with regard to family. OR, I find my own life and foundations of family destroyed or disrupted in any appreciable manner:  because you let fear fester in my siblings. Or took actions that are not consistent, or appropriate:  in accordance with this potential lawsuit.  THEN A PENALTY SUM will be added/ and a civil lawsuit demanding:  I have a right, WILL occur.                                                                            YOUR CHOICE.

 

I DEMAND THE FREEDOM TO ASSIST MY MOTHER AS I SEE FIT/ IN A FREE, AND TRUE DEMOCRACY, that would NOT be questioned. Or more distinctly:  Merely, in ways that do not detract or conceive of any legitimate or illegitimate harm to anyone directly involved. That includes freedom:  from any action or other by the nursing home staff with regard to change; granting, call me if a problem exists/ or take reasonable actions, understanding a discussion will ensue. Nor should this entail any harm to the nursing home or staff by the state. We can all simply work together to form the best solutions possible; as life and society are intended to be.  The contract here is:  When following state rules to be a business; you are simply held innocent (had to do it) until proven otherwise.

The controlling party, which is understood to be the state. IS DEMANDING:  there is no freedom, and there is no right, and they have possession of her life (as is consistent with a prison)/  A reality of control, NOT given to the state. If that control is not  truly accurate of the state/ THEN who controls these decisions, must be answered?  Passing beyond the state, the responsibility of a nursing home is;  to provide her honest and reasonable care/ as best as realistically possible.  A reality of control, that is given to you, the nursing home, with family involved. A fact that will never be “perfect”; just the best we can as a group.

WE CAN, work together simply.  OR, we can legally fight to see what a jury trial will bring. Either way:  this potential legal battle is strictly between “you and me”.  As my siblings refuse, and are finding fear in every corner of their lives; THESE PEOPLE CAN STEAL EVERYTHING; they will take our inheritance.  That fear is, by your decision to fail my mother/ the corruption known in the courts:  I did not cause it. The university diplomas who took over government & corrupted “everything”, did.  Which means UNLESS you are obligated, to alleviate their  fear, and provide written proof of relief:  to them.  Or your decision is to assault and batter, as an enemy of this intended democracy.

My siblings have also deliberately chosen to completely upset my mother; “by making her stop me”; in an attempt to control me. Complicating my relationship with her, in her remaining time on earth. A reality completely without suitable  purpose, simply adding an additional burden to her life.  As she owns no possibility to defend herself. This is simply by definition; the arrogant destruction of my own relationship with my own mother. Another result of tyranny in government. The result of fear (he must be stopped) again: by believing  “these people can take everything”. Which identifies by my conception;  their own truth inside:  “YOU KNOW”, THEY ARE ALL CRIMINALS, the court and its lawyers are completely unfair.  As is true & consistent with the belief, of the vast majority of people in this  society! There is cause:  justice is irrelevant, the courtroom is a predator; the lawyer a thief; and we the people know it is true! Because we are their victims.

The consequent potential of a civil lawsuit not

only for the destruction of family/ but pain and suffering begins its description and will also become evident as time continues;  unfortunately it will undoubtedly, be found true. If you do not simply and plainly alleviate their fears! Failure to do so, is a criminal manipulation of their lives, intended to assault and battery me “from the inside”.

I am the only one in dispute with you, and this dispute is not tied through my mother or siblings. This is about freedom, and the rights associated with democracy itself. The simple truth:  the damned disease of arrogance that permeates society itself because of a university diploma. Which has seized the authority to make every decision, control every life, counterfeit and thereby steal all our work, disrupt and destroy this state and nation, terrorize the world, and produce treason beyond the scope of democracy itself.  Just because they are so damn proud, greedy, and utterly selfish. They even get between my mother and me: to their shame and disgrace.

To the corporate and nursing home entities:  “choose your steps carefully”; as my expectation is limited to a legal dispute with the state of IL (authority in denial) only, at this time. If I should hire attorneys:  they will insist upon your money. I suggest you keep it in mind.  IF my mother dies before I can honestly assist her, due to the actions of this state/ then an open call to all lawyers who want this case shall be displayed on www.justtalking5.info  allowing “take them for whatever you want”.

My decision is to assist my mother as her needs determine what must be done.  The items I supplied: help her eat/ help her nap/ give her the dignity of a place to set her drink, so as not to spill it!  Your decision:  is to remove that right, and that dignity; functionally demanding “your decision is to punish and control”.  Simple and plain!  I suggest to you:  “without appropriate, legal standing”.

 

Send me confirmation of “the freedom to assist as I see fit” in reasonable and fair conjunction with the nursing home staff:   let reality decide.  Or send me the name and address of the state organization to be sued; should they deny my claim of:   a right!

 

This entire matter is to be resolved before March 20, 2017 or the legal development and procedures required for trial shall follow after that date.  Time is allotted due to bureaucracy.

To avoid any issue of “grandstanding or attempting to pull interest into my websites”.  I assure you that is not true.  To accomplish anything of value for the sake of life or planet at this time;  I would need the support of a “billion or so” people.  YOU, are not that, nor will you ever be/ therefore irrelevant!  Apart from interfering in my life, as it applies with respect to my own mother; I have no further interest in you.  Simple and plain. Nor do I have an interest in fighting for people who will not fight for themselves, their planet, life on earth, or a future; not even for their own child.  I AM “done with that”!

Nor will I be breaking their rule, prior to written consignment of my own authority by you;  because in doing so, “the army of the righteous” get to decide my fate. It would be useless, as the army would attack immediately; the righteous worship power. Regardless of reality assigned by my mothers life, justice called freedom for me, evidence established, or the consistent truth called “fair play”/ value gives the right of any other elevation of life over a rule; as fair. It is their trademark of the university rules: “that their rule is god”! it is reality that says: Rules and laws are not the same. Laws define what affects us all, and thereby declares: when your actions make us pay/ you have no right to do that.  Whereas a rule defines:  we the righteous, have decreed “step over this line” and we will make you pay for not obeying us. By taking anything we want/ as is the evidence of interfering between me, and my mother; including the tyranny of fear generated in my siblings, along with the other problems you created for me.  Without a right!

Instead, I will suggest to you: IF there is the slightest will left, to defend democracy alive in this place/ the critical conception is:   BREAK A LAW, as our employee; etc:  including a constitutional law, “and we the people will decide”. More distinctly, “we as a democracy;  when united for freedom”: prove that purpose; literally as, “the owners here”.

The damage your arrogance has done, is already far greater than any conception of the item I have provided to my mother:  COULD EVER do. To your shame.

REALITY SAYS:  IT IS IMPORTANT!  HOW WOULD YOU, LIKE TO SPEND YOUR DAYS WITH NO VIEW OTHER THAN YOUR LAP/ STRUGGLING TO SURVIVE/ WITH NOTHING TO THINK ABOUT BUT DYING?   Just because the damned demand,  they must be obeyed! It may be already too late to be of assistance;  as her change in posture, and a complete lack of purpose have surfaced. BUT THAT has nothing to do, with my demand for the guaranteed constitutional right:  that is a freedom to decide for myself, with respect for all DIRECTLY involved.  RATHER THAN simply oozing the sewage of government dethroned.  The US constitution is dead:  traitors overran it/ the courts refuse it/ and the tyranny of fools committed treason so they could steal from us all.    Simple and plain, the evidence proves this is so.

 

TO:  The nursing home/ etc.

FROM: James Frank Osterbur

Dated:  3/2/17

 

RE:   the replacement chair

While it may suit you, or even my sisters with regard to this chair. It does not solve the fundamental issues as described by me. It does not provide a cup-holder that actually holds the insulated cups you use/ thereby worthless. It does not provide a suitable relief to her neck as when napping her head still lacks basic support. She is in front of the shoulder support instead of on it correctly;  even if it helps some. The rails are lower, but the chair is wider, which means when she does want to rest her arm on a structure there is none available for her to do so/ even though they exist. Worst of all, the chair locks her in her prison of a nursing home:  because it will not successfully load into a vehicle/ does not move successfully across anything but level concrete: the wheels are too small/ the thing too big. She may or may not be able to get closer to a table for eating: it is unlikely. Which means she has still lost that tiny bit of control as well. Nor does it allow for a table she can use or push away for snacks or other through the day.  As to overall comfort compared with the other one: time will tell/ the verdict remains out.

Critical to the reality of this discussion is:  the fact, the entire purpose of this endeavor is, to refuse the son his ability to adapt an environment for his mother. “Demanding NO ONE makes a decision but the state employee: he or she is god”.  Destroying that fundamental of all life:  IT IS FAIR, for a son to attempt or succeed at making life better for his mother/ if she desires it. It’s called a relationship, conceived by family; and it is not a game for you to interfere with. My choice to aid my mother as best I can/ is my choice: not yours. You, have no say:  so long as no danger to the others exists.

The reality of those who believe themselves in absolute control is:  ANY DAMN THING BUT someone else can make their own decision. THAT IS,  prison.  Reality of family;  gives us control/ not the state.  She is not in prison/ you have no legal right to do anything other than establish legitimate care.  Other than the body is not working properly:  she is still functioning inside. Which means you have overstepped your bounds:  her life still knows who helps and who does not/ even if communication is very poor.  As with all other things done by government employees: demanding “I am god/ I have a diploma”/ those in control because of a university diploma have established, their purpose here and everywhere, is to destroy, control, or deny all authority of life;  except for their own. That is called tyranny, and in democracy that is also a definition of treason and betrayal. Manipulation, temptation, threats, bribery, corruption, and control are all foundation trademarks of a university diploma; not leadership betrayal.  And the world itself has suffered tremendously because of university failures and fantasy. I remain committed to the fact:  I HAVE LEGAL RIGHTS/ YOU, don’t own my mother’s life. You shall not take possession of it, other than by what is fair, realistic, and reasonable for her situation.

The items I provided for her: do not come under those definitions.  It is fair I provide. IF WE DO NOT PAY EVERY LAST PENNY you demand for her care in this facility:  YOU WILL take legal and financial actions.  I have rights too!  The items I provided for her:  exist as a realistic solution/ even better than your new replacement chair; and if not, then changes can be made; so long as you don’t interfere. I have rights too! The reasonable demand for non-interference from the state or those whom the state employees control by threat:  is fair. She is my mother/ I am her son:  DON’T interfere in our relationship is a legal right I can enforce.

My decision to aid the life of my mother is fundamental, and distinctly my own decision to make/ it is not yours to interfere with. This replacement chair is functionally insofar as the nursing home is involved;  simply a change they could make in regard to the complaint I have filed here. I appreciate the try; But it does not alter the fundamental control issue:  that I have a right to help my mother as I see fit. In ways that do not detract, nor do they endanger anyone associated with the nursing home or its patients or staff.  Therefore you have no right to interfere. Taking away her personal property to claim:  “we own it now”/ is another step in the wrong direction. Try not to continue on that path. We have spent through insurance and private pay roughly $350,000.00 for the five years mom has been taken care of here:   prove we/ I,  don’t deserve some consideration, as her child. I know I don’t deserve any threats/ neither does my mother/ nor others.. This is not a game, nor is it a threat beyond the demand:  don’t interfere where you don’t belong. This is her life/ this is my life. This is our bond as family shared, and you don’t have a right to interfere. This is for justice “fair and valued to all”/  means you have no say.  Instead, YOU have the obligation to help; as a recipient of the money. YOU have no right to play god;  as in we cannot be questioned/ we cannot change a rule/ we cannot be wrong; etcetera.

This is:  I can do for my mother, just like I have done throughout the past;  as I desire to do. You, can’t interfere: where you don’t belong!

Yes, I am tired of idiots and fools telling me what I can or cannot do.   Completely tired of the extreme failure and foolishness/ lies/ cheating/ stealing/ traitors and terrorists in government. Consequently, this is turning into a fight; that does not need to exist. BY YOUR DECISION.

Make a better decision.

 

 

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Category: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »